I am back at my desk in Cape Town. The heater is on, and a fat lump of a cat is purring across my lap with the confidence of someone who has never paid tax, answered an email or been asked to circle back on anything.
My wife and I are also back rested. That matters because the next three months include two conferences, a redesign of Antistable, workshops to build and sell, continued research and writing, and a couple of important personal goals.
The holiday was meant to create space before all of that began: game drives, proper sleep, books beside a watering hole and nobody needing anything from us. Instead, after a full day of travel, we discovered that our carefully planned week of recovery came with its own angle grinder.
What followed became a practical lesson in how to adapt when plans change without surrendering the outcome that made the plan necessary. Because how to adapt when plans change is rarely tested in ideal conditions; it is tested when reality arrives noisily, inconveniently and carrying industrial equipment with appalling customer-service timing attached.
“Emergency repairs”
On arrival they mentioned “emergency repairs” to its deck. That description was doing the sort of heroic reputational labour normally reserved for tobacco lawyers.
They were not replacing one loose plank or asking a man called Pieter to tighten a suspicious screw. They were rebuilding the entire deck overlooking the watering hole. There was sawing, drilling, hammering and an angle grinder performing what appeared to be a six-hour concept album about the collapse of civilisation.
The workers would be active from 08h30 until 17h00, with a quiet period between 12h00 and 14h00. We had travelled for most of a day and paid specifically for an experience that did not include industrial equipment.
I was angry, which was reasonable. The difficulty was that my anger did not make the angle grinder quieter. It merely installed a second one inside my head.
That is often the first obstacle in learning how to adapt when plans change. Before we redesign anything, we have to accept that the conditions are no longer the ones we planned for.
How stress and recovery affect our ability to adapt
Before the trip, we had recognised that the coming months would demand a great deal from us. In Valorie Burton’s Rules of Resilience, resilience is framed as a balance: our adaptive skills, protective resources and preventative measures need to outweigh the stressors we carry.
The holiday was one of those preventative measures. Time together, sleep, nature and distance from work were protective resources. It mattered because of what was coming next, but also because we had already carried enough. Rest should not have to submit a business case.
After sustained mental, emotional and physical strain, the body can accumulate what researchers call allostatic load: the cumulative biological burden created when allostasis – the body’s process of adjusting its nervous, hormonal and other regulatory systems to meet physical, mental and emotional demands – is repeatedly activated without enough recovery.
In the short term, those adjustments help us perform. When the next demand arrives before the previous one has been absorbed, the cost of functioning rises. Sleep, attention, emotional regulation and metabolism can all be affected, even while we still look functional.
Recovery starts when those demands are reduced. Sleep, psychological detachment, lower stimulation, supportive relationships and greater control over our time help the body’s regulatory systems move closer to their usual rhythms. A break cannot permanently make an unreasonable system reasonable, but it can restore some of the resources sustained pressure has consumed.
That matters when we consider how to adapt when plans change. Adaptability is harder when our available capacity has already been drained.
Give the holiday a victory condition
During Story-to-Stage, Rich Mulholland taught us to establish a victory condition: the specific outcome that tells us whether what we are doing has succeeded. Purpose gives an endeavour meaning. A victory condition turns that meaning into a result we can use to guide decisions.
For this holiday, the victory condition was simple: My wife and I needed to come home rested.
We did not need to manufacture photographs for Instagram or return with a spiritual revelation delivered by a giraffe at sunset while Hans Zimmer played from inside a baobab tree. The week had one job: give our bodies and minds enough time and space to recover.
This is where how to adapt when plans change becomes more than a vague instruction to remain flexible. We need to know what is fixed and what is available for redesign. The construction had destroyed our preferred route, but not the outcome. The watering hole, game drives and a quiet room remained. The original holiday had disappeared, but the resources needed to create another version had not.
We raised the issue and established when the work would happen. We will still be complaining: making the most of the situation does not mean the lodge delivered the experience we paid for. Adapting to change should never excuse poor service.
It was not our fault that the lodge had become a building site. It was still our responsibility to decide what happened to the rest of the week. And that distinction is central to how to adapt when plans change. We can challenge what needs to be challenged without donating the entire experience to the problem.
Once the limits of our influence became clear, feeding the anger would only allow the construction to occupy the hours when it was not happening. Anger is an expensive long-term tenant and rarely pays rent.
Instead, we needed to ask ourselves what strategy still gave us the best chance of achieving the victory condition?
How to adapt when plans change
The simplest answer was changing strategy without changing the goal. We booked morning and evening game drives, rested in our room between them, and used the quiet window from midday to two beside the watering hole.
The original plan had been long, unstructured days beside the water. The revised version was more deliberate: move when the noise began, rest where we could not hear it, and use the two quiet hours around the watering hole.
This is how to adapt when plans change looks like in practice. It was not dramatic or worthy of a motivational poster. It was a timetable.
One morning, I slept in and skipped the game drive. I took my book, sat beside the water and put on my noise-cancelling headphones. It was not the sound of Africa, but it was also not the sound of angle grinding.
We were not pretending the construction had become charming. That would have been lying to ourselves in a calming font. We were thinking accurately enough to distinguish between the outcome we needed and the route we expected to take.
The outcome was rest. The route was negotiable.
Knowing how to adapt when plans change requires acceptance without resignation. The deck was being rebuilt; we could not unbuild it. Our agency lay in how we arranged our days, directed our attention and continued towards the result. The complaint and the adaptation could coexist. We could hold the lodge accountable while refusing to allow its failure to take the holiday from us.
The sequence reflects the resilience model I have been working with: anticipate the demands, design the route and implement a different strategy when conditions change. Anticipate, Design and Implement offer a practical structure for how to adapt when plans change: recognise the demands, create a route towards the result and adjust that route when new information arrives.
The original design had failed, but the objective remained possible. We had received new information, delivered at approximately 11,000 revolutions per minute through a cutting disc.
Plans are hypotheses
Businesses often treat a plan as though it is the objective. After enough meetings, timelines and spreadsheets, the method becomes sacred – usually because somebody colour-coded it and the colour coding took three days.
We do the same personally, spending more energy restoring our preferred picture of progress than pursuing the result. A plan is a hypothesis about the best available route towards an outcome. Understanding that distinction changes how to adapt when plans change because the plan becomes testable rather than sacred.
This does not mean abandoning a direction whenever it becomes difficult. Some objectives require endurance, but commitment to an outcome should not trap us inside a method that has stopped working. When we decide how to adapt when plans change, we can return to the victory condition, identify what changed, separate the necessary outcome from the route we preferred and redirect our effort towards the choices that remain.
That process matters in personal resilience and in business. Markets shift, budgets contract, technology changes and customer expectations move. Yesterday’s strategy can become today’s liability.
A useful approach to how to adapt when plans change is to keep asking whether the route still serves the result. Resilience when plans change means knowing when endurance is required and when redesign is required. The construction remained intrusive, the timing remained disappointing and noise-cancelling headphones remained a poor substitute for grunting hippos. The success of the holiday depended on whether we came home having recovered enough for whatever came next.
And we did. We came home rested and ready to take on the challenges ahead.
That result is why how to adapt when plans change matters. Conditions will move whether we approve of them or not. The more clearly we define the outcome, the less likely we are to confuse one failed route with total failure.
The lodge will still receive the complaint it earned. The angle grinder does not get absolution merely because I managed to read a book near a hippo. But it also did not get the holiday.
Learning how to adapt when plans change begins with one distinction: the route can fail without the outcome becoming impossible. Understanding how to adapt when plans change means deciding what we remain loyal to when reality interferes.
Resilience is not loyalty to the plan. It is loyalty to the outcome.

Personal Resilience Is the Maths of Load Versus Capacity
Personal resilience is the maths of load versus capacity. Use Valorie Burton’s model to understand stressors, resources and why[…]

Customer Centricity: Why Value Must Flow Down
Is customer centricity real within the business you work? Not sure? Start by looking at the direction value travels.[…]

Accountability and Resilience: Turning Mountains Into Speed Humps
Accountability and resilience turn mistakes into momentum by making reality usable, reducing blame, and surfacing issues early.

No responses yet